Discussions

I think it's a huge oversight to not warn users in documentation fhat if ControlD is set up on your router as a TLS connection or using the controld daemon, it allows the user on a device to use private/incognito, thus bypassing all rules and bocks. I was incredibly disappointed to find that and spent hours until I realized what the problem was.

It's probably not possible, but it would be valuable to have the ability to have Reddit without all the NSFW stuff.

Another company has the ability to block image searches. I think this would be valuable.

As the title says, I went through and downloaded it to my phone, installed it in settings, it shows as installed but every blocked site displays the warning still and viewing the certificate details it shows the name of the blocked website and says it's not trusted

I'm new to this and just trying it out but seems I need an endpoint for every device and to associate profiles and schedules to each endpoint. Seems an obvious use case that I want to block what a person has access to and a person has access to multiple devices. So why make me duplicate config for each device when it's obvious the same settings need to apply to all of them?

Dear Admin,

In your privacy policy, there is a section titled Training our algorithmic models

Gostaria de sugerir que mesmo que o cliente mude de endereço mac ou ip o control d não crie um novo cliente, mas sim o mesmo anteriormente conectado ao perfil de dns, isso ajuda a evitar múltiplos perfis na rede do usuário, pois é sem necessidade e prejudica o cliente, tendo que apagar vários novos perfis criados.

Hello,

New relic is a common observability library that is being marked as advertising, but sometimes I need to allow it. That would be helpful to have it as a separate standalone service instead of just a rule.